
I didn’t take part in the Creative Camp talk entitled ‘Women In Technology: Grabbing the Blogosphere by the Balls’. Here are some of the ideas that I was planning to speak on.
The title of this topic has two distinct and different strands. Two subtle themes that branch off and build into discussions all their own. Firstly, the participation of females in technical roles and the secondly, women in blogging. You see, these topics really are separate. Some women in technology keep blogs, but not all women in blogging are necessarily into technology. And why should they be?
Women in Technology: ”Participation rates are at X%, let’s try super hard to shoot for Y%. M’kay?!”
Time and time again, the proportion of women working in technology is played like a game of percentages. The obsessive numbers game is demeaning to women already working in the field. Technology is the application of disciplined engineering to solve a problem. The impulse that kicks off the creative journey into technology is curiosity. Ask any child that pulls apart their toys why they do it, and they’ll retort to the effect of “to see what happens”. Curiosity, pure and simple. Adding rules about how the curiosity of children ought to to be doctored to meet numbers that make the PC faction feel good about themselves, amounts to wholesale societal manipulation.
What we ought to be doing as a society is encouraging children from all walks of life and all socio-economic backgrounds to question known precedents, be it in Politics, the Arts or Sciences. Questioning known principles and pulling apart the systems that we use to deliver education, justice, parenting, engineered solutions and every other convention of life pushes us into new ground. Challenging places, past perceived boundaries. This is motivated not by chalking up numbers on a gender scoreboard, but by opening paths for the children of today to pursue.
So, what’s the Secret Sauce? It has to include the provision of positive role models, quality education from tot to teen and community support mechanisms. There’s no easy solution to build a generation of children willing to challenge perceived norms. Curiosity ought to be nurtured. I want to see generations of engineers. Engineers of political science, engineers of education, engineers of parenting, engineers of software development. Is not the core practice of engineering the solution of problems? Does society not deserve the cold eye of reason bent on solving inequalities? Don’t close the problem of under-representation of women in technology into a neat little silo. Hasn’t that been done enough? Are you complicit?
Women and Blogging: “You Need To Be Like X To Be Taken Seriously”
Blogging is an act of expression just like fashioning a sculpture, telling a story or dancing the samba. We each possess our own unique style. Some like to unearth the fallacies that people artfully hide to get on in life, while others help us celebrate the little things in life - the importance of detail.
Expression is all about externalising your beliefs. Those bells that sing to you, help your moral compass, and guide your humour. Stylistically, I like to blog neutral. I don’t harbour any ambition to follow a herd. I simply want to write material that I’d love to read. And isn’t that the primary motivation of a writer? And, returning to my geek instincts, that love of taximonising behaviour, isn’t blogging just a kind-of writing?
But, nowadays, there are talking heads telling women to assume different voices so we can be taken seriously as writers. They tell us to adapt our commentaries, so they fit little boxes of masculinity. Just so the outside world will take us seriously. Is not this the greatest act of advocacy for separating the gender roles of writers? For sexism in a Wordpress edit box? As we brave our way deeper into the gender question, shouldn’t we question what why certain sectors of our society are advocating that women use soapbox artifices when expressing themselves? Why the nanny state advice? What’s in it for them?
Edit: Coherence fix