Just like every other blogger on the island, I was livid listening to John Waters yesterday morning. I felt personally insulted. Some of the most intelligent, witty and erudite writers I read are via the media of blogs. I’ll not point them out as ego baiting is not my style and?there is enough narcissism inherent in blogging than one can shake a stick at.?Enough to say that every day I’m challenged and educated by these gifted writers. To hear blogs and blogging described as poison is an affront to these writers. A poison onto the face of this talented bunch. A ragged insult.
However, much as I disagree with Waters said, his expression is that of a frightened animal. And frightened animals bite. For as much as I respect the Irish Times, it’s not?the paper it was ten years ago. Online publications had siphoned off a fair degree of the traditional bridging readership of the Times. The Irish Times was the discounted paper I bought every day in college. Science on a Monday, Education (was it a Tuesday?) and Business on a Friday. It used to be 50 pence. Now, I can get comparable news online for free. I’m not the only one. You only have to look at the size of the Irish Times now to gauge how much less of paper it is compared to the heady days of late nineties.
John Waters’ beliefs represents a common enough opinion amongst those that view the enabling power of the Internet as the antithesis of order. To him, it seems, that the freedom of the Internet allows all of the shadowy vices of humanity peek through, pin us down and tempt us from good lives. Righteous paths.?
Freedom of information on the Internet is not societal anarchy, it’s democracy at it’s purest form. What he doesn’t seem to grasp is the stock of free will. Just because I can access virtually anything I want to read on the Internet, doesn’t mean that I necessarily choose to or wish to. Believing that the Internet is a poisoning influence on the morals of users belittles the fortitude of their judgement and their intelligence. Screaming it on national radio does nothing to further one’s case. Essentially, if we, as bloggers choose?to stone?John Waters for his opinions?are we any better than him?